For this post I decided to simply record a conversation I recently had with Holden Caufeild. I called on him after Wednesday’s class to help hash things out about my paper.
Hey Holden it’s Brandon, I was just wondering if you still wanted to get together to help me with my Fate of the Novel Class?
Oh Brandon! Hey of course, god it’s been years, how have you been? Are you still with Mary?
I’m good, No, we broke up about a Year ago
Oh, sorry to hear
It’s for the best
Oh
Anyway Holden, So, I need to talk about the fate of the novel, more or less
Well, what did you have in mind. What do you want to talk about?
I think I’m going to talk about the human condition, how there is something intangible in a novel that has the capacity to change the reader, I’ve kind of split this into three veins of thought.
Sorry, just coughed in your ear…
It’s ok
Go on,
So I think I’m going to try to describe the human condition under three modes, the idea of free will being crippling, that it is a curse and a burden and it is what seperates us from the natural world
Are you going to talk about James and Hobbes and Hume and the like?
Haven’t decided, I don’t particularly want to get into a philosophical rap session
What’s rap
Never mind it came after you, but anyway I’ll look to my peers. Also, in talking about the human condition, I’ll engage with the idea of objective reality. That, it of course is impossible and as thinking beings we struggle terribly with that, that without our presence, there is no reality. Do you know?
Of course I know Brandon
Thanks Holden
What else do you have?
Mostly just that, and, that a novel is an instrument of change. With getting political or Marxist on a broad spectrum of a novel’s impact, that self reflection and appreciation, understanding or gripping even slightly our roles as people can be catalyzed uniquely by the novel.
You know, a lot has already been written on me, well about me, you know?
It’s true
—-long pause—-
I’m not really sure how I’m going to weed through millions of articles on you, about you, and find what I need to describe my own thoughts more clearly and open up my arument for further synthesis and description.
Well, I think you should have a real good grip on your own argument. I would suggest you read me again, and without worrying too much on what the scholarly floodgates may hold, write down why it’s meant so much to you. How you think the novel itself is cpapble of encapsulating the human condition and delivering, unlocking it, for the reader.
Wow Holden, I think that’s really going to help get me started
Anytime Brandon
You’re the best
No you’re the best
Oh! And say hi to Franny for me
Already done, you’ve been on speakerphone
Hi Franny!
Brandon, it’s been so long, I just want you to know, I still love you
Oh Fran
Call me…
I will, but I have to go write a post
Goodluck Brandon!
I love you Brandon!
Thanks Holden…
I love you too Fran…
November 2, 2008 at 3:19 pm |
Brandon,
You made day with this post, this is fucking awesome…Good I am glad you are doing Salinger. I haven’t read it since high school, but I just found my original copy of it…It is my next read…
November 2, 2008 at 3:21 pm |
P.S. I love you too…
November 5, 2008 at 6:46 pm |
This is a clever way to do your post and work through your thoughts regarding your paper. Just to play devil’s advocate here, and to go off of what Kim said in class…it would be a good idea to also crystalize what you mean when you refer to “human condition.” How do you define it or what definition are you going to use? It may help you and your reader to know what specifically you are looking for when you say this.